11th May 2026

Position Update

Recent correspondence from Palm PR’s legal representatives – Ellisons Legal LLP – has resulted in a further review of the material published on this website.

Where appropriate, amendments have been made to ensure continued compliance with legal and procedural obligations. This includes removing or refining material that could interfere with privileged communications or ongoing proceedings.

That said, I remain firmly of the view that maintaining a lawful and evidence-based public chronology of events is both legitimate and justified, particularly where those events have had a substantial impact on a business, its staff, and its clients.

This website will therefore continue to operate as a contemporaneous record of developments connected to the ongoing dispute and related matters. Any future updates will continue to be reviewed carefully prior to publication to ensure they remain factual, proportionate, and legally compliant.

The existence of legal objections does not, in itself, prevent the responsible publication of factual material relating to matters already connected to litigation, regulatory engagement, public filings, and official investigations.

All matters remain subject to the appropriate legal processes and determination by the relevant authorities and courts.

8th May 2026

Investigation Update

Essex Police have now concluded their investigation into the unauthorised access to greyzip Ltd’s systems by a member of Palm PRs staff (who has since left the company).

The investigation resulted in a formal outcome being administered in relation to the Computer Misuse offence investigated.

The investigation related to allegations of unauthorised access to company systems and associated business data. greyzip Ltd continues to regard the underlying events as serious given the commercial impact that followed, including substantial disruption to the business and client relationships, to which that member of staff admitted.

Following correspondence with Essex Police, greyzip Ltd has also been advised that any further disclosure of investigation material would need to be sought through the appropriate civil disclosure process or court order. This process is now underway.

Legal advice is currently being taken in relation to the next stage and full extent of matters arising from these events.

13th April 2026

Litigation Update

Following a formal request for information, I have been notified that further material held by Essex Police will be disclosed in due course, including records relating to the investigation into unauthorised access to Greyzip Ltd’s systems.

The material is expected to be relevant to the circumstances surrounding the unauthorised access and subsequent events affecting Greyzip Ltd’s business.

At this stage, no further comment will be made on the contents of that material. However, it is anticipated that the information will provide additional context to matters already referenced on this site.

All issues arising will continue to be addressed through the appropriate legal and regulatory channels.

Further updates will be provided where it is lawful and appropriate to do so.

2nd March 2026

Litigation Update

Palm-PR Ltd has now filed a Defence in response to Greyzip Ltd’s claim for unpaid invoices currently before the court.

The claim concerns £17,989.55 in outstanding invoices and costs relating to digital marketing services carried out by Greyzip Ltd for Palm PR clients during the parties’ long-standing commercial relationship.

Greyzip Ltd maintains that the services in question were completed and that the invoices were issued, received, and acknowledged at the time, forming part of an established course of dealing between the companies over several years.

The matter will now proceed through the court process, where both parties will have the opportunity to present documentary evidence and witness testimony. This process will allow the court to determine the facts surrounding the work performed, the invoices issued, and the obligations arising from the commercial relationship between the parties.

Greyzip Ltd remains confident in the documentary record supporting its claim. The evidence relating to this dispute includes contemporaneous correspondence, invoice records, and communications created during the course of the parties’ business relationship.

Greyzip Ltd will continue to pursue recovery of the outstanding debt through the appropriate legal channels.

Further updates will be published as the proceedings progress.

27th January 2026

Further Civil Proceedings Update

Palm PR Ltd did not raise any substantive dispute regarding the invoices at the time they were issued or during the months that followed. Solicitors were instructed shortly before the already extended Defence deadline.

Palm PR Ltd requested a further extension of time to file a Defence. That request has not been agreed. The matter will now proceed in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules and any application for further time will be a matter for the court.

These matters are now before the court and will be resolved through due process.

28th December 2025

Civil Proceedings Update

Palm PR Ltd has formally indicated an intention to defend the claim brought by greyzip Ltd in respect of unpaid invoices for services delivered.

The claim concerns invoices that were raised, and no substantive dispute was raised at the time the invoices were issued or during the months that followed. An intention to defend has been communicated only after formal court proceedings were commenced, and close to the expiry of the standard response period. This is now a matter for the court to determine.

Any matters raised by Palm PR Ltd in those proceedings will be addressed through the court in the ordinary course. Where relevant, factual findings, admissions, or documentary evidence emerging from the civil proceedings may also be relied upon in related legal and regulatory contexts, as permitted by law.

greyzip Ltd continues to pursue recovery of the outstanding sums and reserves all rights to seek appropriate remedies available under civil, regulatory, and statutory frameworks.

This update reflects the current procedural position only and does not prejudge the outcome of the proceedings.

12th December 2025

As of today, additional material has come to light that is directly relevant to the matters under investigation.

This material has been formally provided to Essex Police this evening and is currently subject to review as part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

In order to preserve the integrity of that investigation, this evidence will not be published at this stage. Any further disclosure will be made only after confirmation from law enforcement that doing so would not prejudice proceedings.

This site will continue to be updated responsibly and in accordance with legal advice, with the sole purpose of maintaining an accurate public record.

20th November 2025

These reviews are publicly available on Glassdoor and have been posted by individuals identifying themselves as former employees of Palm PR Ltd.

I make no claim as to the accuracy of the statements made by these reviewers. Readers should review the original posts and draw their own conclusions.

19th November 2025

As part of the civil recovery process relating to £15,132 owed to greyzip Ltd, an enforcement agent attended the home of Palm PR’s director, Emily Keogh, on 19th November 2025.

In the agent’s documented report, Ms Keogh:

• Did not dispute the debt,
• Did not provide any evidence that the debt was invalid,
• Claimed she had never seen the invoices (despite written proof of delivery, LBAs etc), and
• Immediately began making unsolicited allegations about me, which the agent described as irrelevant and inappropriate.

The agent stated:

“She was uneasy and asked the agent to keep his voice down… She stated she was being targeted by the other party and went on to make allegations about the other party.”
– Enforcement Report, 19th Nov 2025

Instead of addressing payment of a legitimate commercial debt, Ms Keogh attempted to redirect the conversation by making serious defamatory allegations against me – allegations she did not raise with any regulator, legal authority, accountant, or solicitor prior to enforcement proceedings.

In my opinion, this behaviour suggests a couple of troubling points:

1. Attempting to use serious unverified allegations to avoid a lawful debt

Nothing within UK commercial law permits a director to refuse payment for completed work because of gossip, rumours, or personal views.

The debt remains:

• Contractually valid
• Fully evidenced
• Pursued through correct legal channels

Palm PR has never provided:

• A dispute form
• A counter-invoice
• A formal denial grounded in contract
• Or any written justification for withholding payment

Instead, Ms Keogh appeared to rely on seriously damaging allegations, presented to a third party with no relevance whatsoever to the debt. This raises a serious concern about whether she believes that making false defamatory statements excuses her company from its financial obligations.

2. This behaviour may constitute defamatory communication

The agent’s report describes statements that:

• Were made to a third party,
• Asserted as fact,
• Without evidence,
• And in a context where the false allegation could cause serious reputational harm.

This has now been passed to my legal team for assessment under the Defamation Act 2013, and may be linked to earlier defamatory statements circulated to clients using anonymous email accounts. This interaction was also recorded on video.

Instead of paying the money Palm PR legally owes, or engaging through the proper channels, Ms Keogh appears to believe that making serious false allegations about me excuses her company from meeting its contractual obligations.

Nothing in UK law supports this position.

The debt remains valid.
Enforcement continues.
Her unlawful and troubling comments have no legal bearing on the matter, but they do raise wider questions about her conduct as a company director.

17th November 2025

It is a matter of public record that shortly after being interviewed by police in relation to the unauthorised access to my company’s servers, Richard Nyande left his role at Palm PR. I make no allegation about his motives; I simply note the timing.

1st September 2025

Palm PR attempted to suppress my factual review of their conduct. This is the letter that was sent to Googles legal team via post and electronically.

13th August 2025

After I sent the email below, Liam did not respond (as requested) and has since cut off contact on LinkedIn. I am not speculating about his motives, but his silence and distancing are consistent with a desire to avoid further engagement while investigations are ongoing. Any further actions will be included here as part of the contemporaneous record.

1st August 2025

All of this information is available in the public domain for all to review. In my opinion these anomalies do not prove misconduct in themselves, but they raise serious questions about Palm PR’s governance and financial transparency. Public filings show substantial changes in the company’s financial position. Readers are encouraged to review the filings directly and form their own conclusions.

• A 49% cut in called-up share capital (from £100 to £51) with no supporting explanation on the public record.

• A director loan note inconsistency: filings state the balance was “repaid in full within 9 months,” yet £94,898 remains recorded.

• The Profit & Loss account has been omitted under s.444(1), which is lawful but removes performance detail at a time of large swings in equity.

• Net assets collapsed from +£62,910 to –£19,800 in one year, alongside nearly tripled borrowings (from £38,570 to £131,920).

29th July 2025

This is additional outreach to Emily Keogh that went without any response.

9th May 2025

Palm PR still have £15,132 (reduced from £15,726 as I would never claim for work not completed) in outstanding invoices since September 2024 with no contact with myself since – despite various attempts at outreach by myself and my debt chasing teams.

A formal Letter Before Action has been served, and Palm PR are on notice. On legal advice, I am awaiting the outcome of the criminal investigation involving their employee, Richard Nyande, greyzip Ltd continues to reserve its legal rights.

13th March 2025

The criminal case was transferred from the Metropolitan Police to Essex Police, as a staff member of Palm PR resides in Essex and forms part of the ongoing enquiries.

26th September 2024

This is outreach to Emily Keogh that went without any response.

13th August 2024

This contemporaneous email (13 August 2024) shows I introduced the concept of ‘Digital Exposure’ to Palm PR and raised the issue of IP/licensing. Palm PR subsequently adopted this terminology and model, with my former staff.